<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Dear All,<br>
    <br>
    I'm in favour of  "Bristol/Embecosm Embedded Benchmark Suite", as,
    like Simon states below, energy is "only" one way it can be used.<br>
    <br>
    Best wishes,<br>
    Kerstin<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/08/2014 21:51, Simon Cook wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAFOzG3sLvhcSR1W+2U=bv+AgRuTAyRCOBc1DKyuOowi9QqV2zA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>Hi Andrew,<br>
          <br>
        </div>
        (I may have this history slightly wrong, but this is the order
        of events I recall.)<br>
        <div><br>
          I believe originally it was Bristol Energy Efficiency
          Benchmark Suite (note README.md still refers to this), but
          then to add Embecosm to the name, and to avoid having BEEEBS
          as the name morphed into Bristol/Embecosm Energy Efficiency
          Benchmark Suite, where the B stands for both Bristol and
          Embecosm.<br>
          <br>
        </div>
        <div>Over time, we wanted to emphasise Embedded as the target,
          so Efficiency was dropped in favour of Embedded (and the two
          Es were swapped). I think Energy may have been dropped at some
          point, as whilst the original benchmark suite was used for
          energy, we didn't want it to be useful exclusively for this
          purpose, so we end up with Bristol/Embecosm Embedded Benchmark
          Suite.<br>
          <br>
        </div>
        <div>For consistency, I would choose "Bristol/Embecosm Embedded
          Benchmark Suite", as in my view that's what describes it best.
          It's a benchmark suite targetting embedded systems, energy is
          one way we're using it, but it's not the only way it can be
          used. I realise that's different to the name chosen in the
          meeting, but thats just my view on the name.<br>
          <br>
        </div>
        <div>Of course, if the consensus is for "Bristol/Embecosm Energy
          Benchmark Suite", we should go for that. Any other thoughts
          anyone?<br>
        </div>
        <div>
          <br>
          Thanks,<br>
          Simon<br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
          <br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 8:17 PM,
            Andrew Burgess <span dir="ltr"><<a
                moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:andrew.burgess@embecosm.com"
                target="_blank">andrew.burgess@embecosm.com</a>></span>
            wrote:<br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
              0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
              rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">I was going to
              standardise the expanded name used throughout the BEEBS<br>
              code and just wanted to double check that there's
              agreement on what<br>
              the actual name should be.<br>
              <br>
              Currently on the wiki here for example:<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://mageec.org/2014/06/20/introducing-beebs-benchmarking-for-energy/"
                target="_blank">http://mageec.org/2014/06/20/introducing-beebs-benchmarking-for-energy/</a><br>
              We go with "Bristol/Embecosm Embedded Energy Benchmark
              Suite", which<br>
              seems to have too many E's.<br>
              <br>
              In the code we currently have:<br>
              <br>
                    1 Bristol/Embecosm Benchmark Suite<br>
                    4 Bristol/Embecosm Embedded Benchmark Suite<br>
                  100 Bristol/Embecosm Embedded Energy Benchmark Suite<br>
                  277 Bristol/Embecosm Energy Efficiency Benchmark<br>
                    2 Bristol Energy Efficiency Benchmark Suite<br>
              <br>
              In the last meeting, according to the notes:<br>
                   <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="http://mageec.org/wiki/Meeting_21_July_2014"
                target="_blank">http://mageec.org/wiki/Meeting_21_July_2014</a><br>
              we agreed on "Bristol/Embecosm Energy Benchmark Suite"<br>
              <br>
              but I thought we'd agreed "Bristol/Embecosm Embedded
              Benchmark Suite".<br>
              <br>
              Would anyone like to pick one?  If I don't hear anything
              else I'll go<br>
              with "Bristol/Embecosm Energy Benchmark Suite" as that's
              what the<br>
              minutes say we agreed on.<br>
              <br>
              Thanks,<br>
              Andrew<br>
              <br>
              _______________________________________________<br>
              mageec mailing list<br>
              <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:mageec@mageec.org"
                target="_blank">mageec@mageec.org</a><br>
              <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="http://mageec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mageec"
                target="_blank">http://mageec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mageec</a><br>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          <br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
mageec mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mageec@mageec.org">mageec@mageec.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mageec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mageec">http://mageec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mageec</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>