[MAGEEC] [BEEBS] Approaching Release 2.0
jeremy.bennett at embecosm.com
Fri Aug 29 09:37:09 BST 2014
On 28/08/14 17:47, James Pallister wrote:
> That looks fine to me.
> Did we ever settle on licensing? Should we remove some benchmarks which
> don't have compatible licenses? Perhaps we could find replacements.
I think we agreed to take out the test concerned (I believe it is only
one). It would be good to find a replacement, but that should not hold
up BEEBS 2.0.
Licensing should be GPL.
> On 28/08/14 16:43, Andrew Burgess wrote:
>> With an eye towards making a BEEBS 2.0 release around the start of
>> September I'd like to know if there are any outstanding issues that
>> people know of relating to BEEBS.
>> The current known issue list is here:
>> Of that list there's only one bug and I believe that is fixed.
>> So what blockers do people see between here and 2.0?
>> mageec mailing list
>> mageec at mageec.org
> mageec mailing list
> mageec at mageec.org
Tel: +44 (1590) 610184
Cell: +44 (7970) 676050
Email: jeremy.bennett at embecosm.com
More information about the mageec