[MAGEEC] BEEBS analysis

[Andrew Burgess]

On 8 August 2014 11:31, Stoil Ganev <sg13286.2013 at my.bristol.ac.uk> wrote:

> I am looking for feedback on the format of the data and whether I should
> move the repositry under MAGEEC or just make it part of the beebs one.

Analysis data should not be added into the BEEBS repository, if we did then
every change to been could, potentially, require all the analysis data to be
regenerated, the alternative is we'd carry around stale data, neither of which
sound very good.  Also, the analysis data is only of interest to a small
sub-set of the possible BEEBS users.

HTH
Andrew